Hyper-Energy Theory

Section files are now available for the forthcoming paper:

Is energy limited to the substantive mass-energy of the matter system?
(Styled for Phys. Rev. D15)

Overview of Paper: (Last updated August 16, 2004)

At the highest level of philosophic thought, hyper-energy theory addresses a long standing question of potentially immense practical importance. Namely:

Q1: Is energy limited to the substantive mass-energy of the matter system?

Before the advent of big bang cosmology (BBC), the generally expected answer to Q1 was YES. This was due to the generally accepted belief that the space of this universe is devoid of any fundamental properties. But the advent of BBC has forced us to realize that a YES answer to Q1 requires abandoning the hallowed principle of energy conservation, and thus, the forfeiting of any possibility that our seemingly 3-dimensional, temporal, matter-energy system might be energetically linked to a permanent hyper-dimensional form of energy, called hyper-energy, say, as a possible answer to the now open question, what existed before the big bang?

If the hyper-energy hypothesis is valid, the expanding space of our universe would certainly contain a qualifying energy density (e/o, say) that would have to be explained by the field laws of hyper-energy leading to the big bang, which laws we would be of course obliged to delineate. It is therefore useful to recall that when James Clerk Maxwell attempted to formulate a theory of gravity that would be consistent with the unified understanding of electricity, magnetism, and light that his new theory provided, he concluded that the space of this universe must be endowed with an enormous intrinsic [classical] energy density, [1] which we will then let e/o stand for. For according to Maxwell's reasoning, the purely attractive interaction of electrically neutral bodies had to be the result of a mass induced reduction of this enormous space-energy density to e < e/o, the [hyper-energy] physics of which he left to future fundamental theorists as he shelved his gravity theory, saying: Considering the immense practical consequences that might well ensue if Maxwell's e/o (and thus the hyper-energy continuum needed to explain it) could be substantiated, it is good to know that, with today's knowledge and the precision of today's tools of thought, Maxwell's e/o, taken as a postulate, provides an entirely sufficient physical principle for systematically deriving the general physical principles and the general mathematical physics of the new hyper-energy physics. This is what you will find in the paper, as a 30 year upgrade of my original 1975 publication. [2]

The authenticity of the new hyper-energy physics that is systematically derived in the paper from Maxwell's e/o can be readily judged via the specific qualities that some such new physics has been expected to have in view of the fact that, in order for it to explain the big bang origin of our space and time and matter, called the BBC Problem, the new physics must transcend our classical and quantum matter theories in the course of resolving the much older quantum gravity problem. These considerations have brought us face to face with the realization that a major new physics and scientific revolution is inevitable; involving, as Sir John Maddox recently summarized it: [3] Concerning the general mathematical physics of hyper-energy which is systematically evolved in the paper, we will say only this here. The existence of Maxwell's e/o gets preserved via its shear enormity, since that leads to the recognition that a constant relative flow of e/o, which can only exist in a propagating inertial laboratory, is simply not measurable given that the conservation laws of energy and momentum are preserved.

A constant relative velocity of e/o is therefore a vector gauge field, u, of gravity, the first matter field to be absorbed into the new hyper-energy physics, with the clear understanding that the total time rate of change of u accounts for the two previously disparate forces of 'elevator gravity' and matter gravity.

The precise way that matter particles couple to e/o so as to insure the conservation of their energy and momentum, and thus the local un-observability of u, is shown to dictate the Lorentz invariance of particle interactions with particles and e <= e/o, with clear causal understandings of all of the resulting, lightspeed/(Mach one) limiting deformations of mass, energy, volume, and oscillator frequency. Clock frequency reduction, and thus physical time dilation, the historically most esoteric of all of the coupling deformations, is thus shown to be simply a totally dependent physical effect of the coupling. So time flows, hyper-dynamically, at its maximum rate through the e/o-continuum.

Hence, one of the most admirable qualities of Hyper-energy theory is that it absorbs, both naturally and fortuitously, the entire 350 year mature mathematical physics of nonlinear compressible fluid dynamics, logically extending its descriptive power moreover to (p > 3)-spatial dimensions; so that it can account for both the rich classical Maxwellian energy density of the expanding, compactified, pseudo 3-dimensional, space of this universe, as well as the mass-energy structures of all of its embedded (and embeddable) massive and massless particles; so as to account for both the pseudo 'rigid' characteristics of some particles and some bulk matter, and the more general fluid dynamic characteristics of electrodynamics and bulk matter. Things that any other candidate for a unified field theory would also be obliged to account for.

In the precise manner envisioned by Dirac for the physics of the future, with the ability to understand electron structure and de Broglie's matter waves, quantum mechanics simply gets much better understood. [4]

[1] James Clerk Maxwell, "A Dynamical Theory of the Electromagnetic Field", Phil. Trans. 155, 1865, pp. 459-512, p. 493.
[2] R. E. Var, "On a New Mathematical Framework for Fundamental Theoretical Physics", Vol. 5, No. 3, Sept. 1975, pp. 407-431. [3] Sir John Maddox, What Remains to be Discovered, (The Free Press, 1998), pp. 98-120.
[4] P. A. M. Dirac, "The Evolution of the Physicist's Picture of Nature, Sci. Am. Vol. 208, No. 5, May 1963.

____________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________

In Sections I through XI, three increasingly comprehensive, classical gauge-field theories (GFT1-3)are derived and shown to cover:
File Download Options (for the currently available Abstract through Section VI)

The following file options are provided to accommodate the different user download capabilities and preferences. Right Click to Download PDF and/or Zipped PDF files. Left Click to view PDF files.

Section Range Type Size(KB) Filename
The Abstract to Section VI PDF 2392 HyperEnergy_A_VI.pdf
ZIP 1076 HyperEnergy_A_VI_PDF.zip
The Abstract to Section III PDF 1567 HyperEnergy_A_III.pdf
ZIP 650 HyperEnergy_A_III_PDF.zip
Sections IV to VI PDF 674 HyperEnergy_IV_VI.pdf
ZIP 322 HyperEnergy_IV_VI_PDF.zip

Coming in October 2004:

The remaining sections describing qualitative applications of the third gauge field theory (GFT3), and thus, of General Hyper-energy Theory to:
Contact Information:

Robert E. Var, President
HyperSpace Solutions
130 Sheffield Road
Waltham, MA
02451-2323
(781) 891-4136
RvarSpace@alum.mit.edu

This form sends an e-mail to the author, Robert Var

Name:

Mail:

Comment:


SCRAP.................................. Hyper-energy theory is a new, fundamental, hyper-dimensional-energy field theory candidate for a unified field theory and cosmology, which introduces itself in the precise way that has long been anticipated; by solving the 65 year old quantum gravity problem. It does this moreover in a suprisingly classical and practical way that vindicates Einstein's steadfast belief in a classical TOE, while absorbing his two relativity theories into a more fluid-dynamic Lorentz-invariant nonlinear description of continuous energy, and thus gravity, than Einstein had thought possible, but which other theorists of his time (like, Dirac, Dürr, Weinberg, Heisenberg, and others) had increasing come to favor, most notably after Einstein's passing. [1]

Dirac, for instance, was quite certain that a classical physics of the future would be able to explain electron structure, without the complications of the uncertainty principle which need only pertain to particle interactions. [2]

Heisenberg, too, wound up advising theorists to pursue a classical explanation for the many ways that kinetic mass-energy unleashed in head-on collisions gets converted into particles, subject to the boundary conditions resident in the so-called "empty-space". The particle spectrum can be understood, Heisenberg said, only if the underlying dynamics of matter is known; dynamics is the central problem. [3]

Hyper-energy theory therefore absorbs, both naturally and fortuitously, the entire 350 year mature mathematical physics of nonlinear compressible fluid dynamics, and moreover, logically extends its descriptive power to (p > 3)-spatial dimensions; so that it can account for both the rich classical (Maxwellian) energy-structure of the expanding, compactified, pseudo 3-dimensional, space of this universe as well as the mass-energy structures of all of its embedded (and embeddable) massive and massless particles; so as to account for both the pseudo 'rigid' characteristics of some particles and some bulk matter, and the more general fluid dynamic characteristics of electrodynamics and bulk matter. Things that any other candidate for a unified field theory would also be obliged to account for.

In other words, hyper-energy theory is primarily a generalized hyper-dimensional soliton-structure energy theory, and only secondarily a soliton-particle-interaction energy theory that absorbs Einstein's two relativity theories and the enormous intrinsic energy density of space deduced by Maxwell, thereby laying a classical foundation for understanding de Broglie matter waves and the resulting quantum mechanics of particle interactions. END SCRAP--------------------------------------